Why should I switch litespeed to caddy
Used for a while litespeed commercial version
The commercial version of litespeed is really powerful and it's not difficult to configure
But finally after testing against caddy, it was decided to switch the server to caddy
In the same context as architecture, network, program, system environment
Test found caddy response faster than litespeed for about 2 seconds.
Caddy also supports the latest quic protocol
Although functionally no litespeed powerful
But overall, the web server is enough.
💘 相关文章
- 我为什么要把litespeed切换成caddy
- Openlitespeed /litespeed 添加HSTS的方法
- 重设litespeed的web管理密码
- 这应该是最全的Litespeed的教程了
- Why the used car market can survive the economic downturn
- 使用301实现域名跳转到www包括https的3种方法
- Openlitespeed /litespeed 配置文件参考收藏
- how to Reset litespeed web management password
- Openlitespeed /litespeed deny methods to access folders and files
- 不知道是不是错觉,感觉caddy 比nginx快