
Why should I switch litespeed to caddy
Used for a while litespeed commercial version
The commercial version of litespeed is really powerful and it's not difficult to configure
But finally after testing against caddy, it was decided to switch the server to caddy
In the same context as architecture, network, program, system environment
Test found caddy response faster than litespeed for about 2 seconds.
Caddy also supports the latest quic protocol
Although functionally no litespeed powerful
But overall, the web server is enough.
💘 相关文章
- 我为什么要把litespeed切换成caddy
- LiteSpeed 旗下特色的免费CDN加速服务QUIC.cloud
- Caddy配置ssl證書出現One or more domains had a problem:的解決方法
- Openlitespeed /litespeed 配置文件参考收藏
- Openlitespeed /litespeed deny methods to access folders and files
- caddy httpserver.ResponseWriterWrapper is not a closeNotifier的解決方法
- Openlitespeed /litespeed 常用的伪静态(rewrite)规则大全
- 折腾了一天终于搞定了Caddy的配置
- Openlitespeed /litespeed 添加HSTS的方法
- litespeed下typecho伪静态规则