admin avatar

Why should I switch litespeed to caddy

🕕 by admin

Used for a while litespeed commercial version

The commercial version of litespeed is really powerful and it's not difficult to configure

But finally after testing against caddy, it was decided to switch the server to caddy

In the same context as architecture, network, program, system environment

Test found caddy response faster than litespeed for about 2 seconds.

Caddy also supports the latest quic protocol

Although functionally no litespeed powerful

But overall, the web server is enough.

💘 相关文章

📝 有偿服务

• 服务器合租380/年
• 服务器配置:2.4G,6核12线程
• nvme raid 1硬盘
• 不提供服务器自主面板
• 适合稳定的个人博客
• 提供备份服务,备份空间自备
• 只提供ipv6地址,搭配cloudflare使用
• 提供想要安装的程序和域名
• 博客必须是和谐健康的
• 博客不能是视频和图片站
• 提供以下付费服务
• 建站,FTP,备份,Linux,Wordpress等建站问题咨询管理
• 加微信:344452500(不闲聊,直接说事)


Based on Golang + fastHTTP + sdb | go1.16.8 Processed in 0ms